I read an article that was speaking on the gay marriage ruling in California. The article was interesting enough, but it was commentary that the author received that just made me think… Really?
I feel the need for a disclaimer:
I have always been an advocate for the rights of those in the LGBT community. Why? BECAUSE THEY ARE CIVIL RIGHTS! Anyone who can cheer on the rights of and march next to Black people, need to realize that rights are rights. Anyone who tries to justify my need to rally on behalf of the LGBT community because after 33 heterosexual years I have a female partner, needs to retire that argument before opening his mouth.
That said, here is what bothered me (taken from the post):
Daniel Lee added this: “You missed the logic course in high school. Your position is that society should approve of homosexual ..marriages’ because the nation didn’t collapse with a small percentage of intermarriage between the races. The first fallacy is treating two unlike objects the same, that’s called false analogy. Because the results from action A didn’t end life as we know it, therefore action B will have the same result. But actions A and B (racial and gender intermarriage) are not the same, and therefore concluding that their effect would be the same are questionable.
“The second and more obvious fallacy is greatly exaggerating an outcome … to prove something isn’t bad, and therefore we should accept it. … That’s a straw man fallacy. The result from action A wasn’t catastrophic, therefore we shouldn’t oppose more of the same. … It’s obvious that a change in law won’t result in immediate huge societal changes, but rather a small and growing effect over many decades.
“What you need to describe when advocating for racial and homosexual positions is an accurate description of their effect on the country over a long period of time. The nation didn’t fall apart immediately upon past changes, but look at the federal, state and city budgets today. We are heading towards a nation falling apart, and why really is that?”
Okay, if you take away all that is meant to obfuscate the issue, you get down to a fundamentally ignorant argument. (BTW, I should have added in my disclaimer that this isn’t a balanced analysis of both sides of the argument.) I felt the need to reply to said commentary:
Apparently, Daniel Lee missed US History 101.
Being a Black woman from the South, I feel the need to educate Mr. Lee and others who simply don’t get it. Black people in this country weren’t even viewed as human, much less kinda sorta equal when it was decided that miscegenation was an abomination. (intentional use of the word, since people throw it around so much right now) The thought of a Caucasian person intermarrying with a person of African decent was about as well received (and marked a direct corollary to) intermarrying with an animal. Now, I know that we’re enlightened now (sarcasm), but we cannot forget the proper context in which this legislation was written. Nor, can we dismiss the importance of its dismissal.
That said, comparing the two scenarios–same sex marriage and interracial marriage–is absolutely a proper comparison. Because members of the LGBT community and same sex relationships are not seen as right or proper, which is the foundation of the argument against the community and gay marriage, anything that seemingly equalizes the rights of said community is the same as doing what this country did (albeit far too late) for non-White peoples years ago. It’s about time that people understand that this is exactly the same issue that Martin Luther King, Jr was fighting for. The irony is that those who are the most verbose opponents of gay marriage are the very ones crying over MLK’s speech while drinking lemonade and enjoying barbeque on their day off.
You can’t have it both ways, people. It’s either equal rights for everyone or it’s not. Period. Which one will you choose? Institutionalized bigotry or the freedom that this country is supposed to represent?
Now, let me tell you something, people. For those of you living in more progressive areas, you need to understand that the framework of all that you believe–all that you hold true–has been crafted by progressive people around you. There is an entire public who would still vote in slavery if it were on the ballot (to quote Sen. Vincent Fumo). It is true. And you know what else? How a community treats its LGBT community is the same way that it thinks at it’s core (when one has been drinking, becomes angry, is fearful (read: Michael Richards aka Cramer, the LAPD, the NYPD, the idiots who dragged James Byrd to death in Jasper, and countless others)) about people of color.
The notion that PEOPLE want “special rights” to do what their neighbors do is proposterous! When will the separation of church and state actually extend to that uncomfortable feeling inside of people who have to think about that dirty fellatio or that horrible cunnilingus or (God, forbid) the anal sex that “those people” are having in their bedrooms. Guess where “those people” learned it? Not to mention, “Love your neighbor” doesn’t mean ‘Love your straight neighbor.’ Who gets to sit at the table? Who defined that list?
Anything less than rights that extend to all people should be unacceptable if you live in this country. If you want people’s rights to be trumped live in a Communist country. Oh, and I have the feeling that those who speak out against gay marriage are the same ones who think Cuba, China and Venezuela are countries that need the good American example of democracy and freedom.
FREEDOM is what we should be marching to protect. FREEDOM to practice the religion that we choose, or to not practice at all. FREEDOM to express our ideas and beliefs. FREEDOM to love who we want to love. And most importantly, the FREEDOM to do all of that within the confines of a country that was designed to do just that and has systematically done the opposite since the first slaying of the first Native American.
I invite you to start living Martin Luther King, Jr’s dream by being open to the possibilities of living outside of the constructed reality that Theocrats (yes, my word for this theodemocracy) would have you to believe.
Let’s talk about it.
-gd
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” US Bill of Rights
And for those bearing the cross as a sword…
1 PETER 2:15 TEV
15 For God wants you to silence the ignorant talk of foolish people by the good things you do.
1 TIMOTHY 6:18 CEV
18 Instruct them to do as many good deeds as they can and to help everyone. Remind the rich to be generous and share what they have.
1 JOHN 3:14 TEV
14 We know that we have left death and come over into life; we know it because we love others. Those who do not love are still under the power of death.
1 JOHN 3:18 TEV
18 My children, our love should not be just words and talk; it must be true love, which shows itself in action.
1 JOHN 4:7 TEV
7 Dear friends, let us love one another, because love comes from God. Whoever loves is a child of God and knows God.
LEVITICUS 19:18 NKJ
18 ..You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord.
MATTHEW 19:19 NKJ
19 ..Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ..You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ ”
MATTHEW 22:39 NKJ
39 “And the second is like it: ..You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’
MARK 12:31 NKJ
31 “And the second, like it, is this: ..You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”
LUKE 10:27 NKJ
27 So he answered and said, ” ..You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind,’ and ..your neighbor as yourself.’ ”
ROMANS 13:9 NKJ
9 For the commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not bear false witness,” “You shall not covet,” and if there is any other commandment, are all summed up in this saying, namely, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
GALATIANS 5:14 NKJ
14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
JAMES 2:8 NKJ
8 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you do well;
PHILIPPIANS 2:4 NKJ
4 Let each of you look out not only for his own interests, but also for the interests of others.
MATTHEW 7:12 NKJ
12 “Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.
ROMANS 13:10 NKJ
10 Love does no harm to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.
ROMANS 15:2 NKJ
2 Let each of us please his neighbor for his good, leading to edification.
HEBREWS 13:1-2 NKJ
1 Let brotherly love continue.
2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some have unwittingly entertained angels.
Posted in life, politics, relationships